NAMI - National Alliance on Mental Illness Home | About NAMI | Contact Us | En Espanol  | Donate  
  Advanced Search  

Sign In
Register and Join
What's New
State & Local NAMIs
Advocate Magazine
NAMI Newsroom
NAMI Store
National Convention
Special Needs Estate Planning
NAMI Travel

 Veterans Resources
  Public Policy
  Traumatic Brain Injury
  Women's Issues
  Multicultural Issues
  For Families
  VA and VISN
  Veterans and Suicide
  Mental Illnesses
  Homeless Vets
  Active-duty Service Members
  Veterans Council
  Online Discussion
  Join NAMI
  Tribute Honor Roll

Print this page
Graphic Site
Log Out
 | Print this page | 

NAMI Joins “Friend of the Court Brief” Supporting Medicaid Provisions in the Affordable Care Act

NAMI has joined 38 colleague national organizations in filing an Amicus (Friend of the Court) brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Florida v. HHS challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case on Mar. 26-28, 2012. A decision is expected in late June or early July. While the consolidated cases that the Court will cover a range of issues, including the constitutionality of the individual mandate to have health insurance, the brief that NAMI joined was restricted to a critical issue for children and adults living with mental illness, the law’s expansion of Medicaid eligibility up to 138 percent of the poverty level.

The brief that NAMI joined asserts that the case for overturning the expansion of Medicaid eligibility jeopardizes not just Medicaid, but also a host of other federal programs and antidiscrimination protections that hinge on the Constitution’s “Spending Clause.” The Spending Clause allows Congress to offer states money, with conditions, to encourage states to participate in a joint federal-state effort to address a range of policy needs including safety net services such as mental health services, education, child welfare, highway safety, property rights, and discrimination based on race, gender or disability. If a state disagrees with the conditions that accompany the federal money, the state can decline the money. The brief argues that if the Supreme Court holds that the Medicaid Expansion is unconstitutional, then an array of cooperative federal-state spending programs could become subject to constitutional challenge.

Posted: February 17, 2012

 | Print this page | 


Support NAMI to help millions of Americans who face mental illness every day.

Donate today

Speak Out

Inspire others with your message of hope. Show others they are not alone.

Share your story

Get Involved

Become an advocate. Register on to keep up with NAMI news and events.

Join NAMI Today
Home  |  myNAMI  |  About NAMI  |  Contact Us  |  Jobs  |  SiteMap

Copyright © 1996 - 2011 NAMI. All Rights Reserved.